Home » Articles posted by Jean-Paul Close (Page 5)

Author Archives: Jean-Paul Close

Our current global mental health problems are caused by our forced addiction to money

In an overarching reality fully focused on money (financial growth), we get deprived of morality and unconsciously develop mental disorders at all levels of society. Nearly all our current global challenges can be attributed to that. Disconnecting from the financial doctrine, embracing the morality of our sustainable existence as a natural species in our natural Earth habitat, gives us again a sense of meaning and purpose. It empowers us mentally, healing old problems while developing a sustainable future together. But we need to make the disconnecting choice. The experiences, with the introduction of an alternative coined as Sustainocracy, have provided useful insights with very promising results. They were published in the global Journal of Mental Disorders (article to be released soon, available upon request).

When my article on “breaking with our heritage” was published, through the University of Urbino in Italy and the Euro-Spes community on business and spirituality, I was invited by the Journal of Mental Health Disorders to reflect on such mental turning points through their global magazine.

A mental turning point was experienced when I decided to break away from the doctrines of the financial world in order to develop certain ethical considerations that were important to me. The benefit of such breaking is that one develops a new reality, getting to compare both, the finance driven doctrine and the one based on ethical values, also from a mental empowerment point of view. The analysis remains very subjective when only related to me, a potential outcast of a mainstream functioning of society. It becomes more objective when relating it to other mental and behavioral breaking points experienced by more people, even by entire regions, such as the city of Eindhoven.

Equally I could relate to the reaction of people and institutions when invited to join the activities of the human centered “Sustainocracy”, an environment based on my own moral awareness about existential human values. For instance to develop the “healthy city” together. Especially the activities of COS3i for social inclusion became a Box of Pandora with many people carrying different kinds of old traumas. These had mostly been inflicted by the impact of a single approach to reality through doctrines (such as money or religion). Presenting people with an alternative, a second choice based on human values, gave many a mental boost. It equally showed the negative impact on mental health when people get disconnected from morality. It undermines their identity, their behavior, their wellness, while developing mental and behavioral disorders that can range from psychoses, burn-out, behavioral tunnel visions, competitive aggression up to deeply rooted narcissism.

This does not only affect people in a situation of financial disadvantage but also those that develop well in the financial competitive hierarchies. Presenting people again with morality breaks with the limiting tunnel visions, enhancing their well being with meaning and purpose. This happens in a job, in leadership positions and also in people’s private life. When they feel meaning and purpose again they equally feel the possibility to give their old trauma’s a place in their past. They develop their own breaking point and empowerment.

Only when an alternative, such as the approach of Sustainocracy, is introduced as an healing injection of morality, the old mental disorders become apparent. Before they were nasty handicaps, problems for society. They justified the appearance of all kinds of care institutions that function within the same overarching doctrine. These normally don’t solve the problem, they suppress them or try to get people to deal with them through denial or minimization. The mental disorders also develop into political and financial hierarchical clusters, deprived of morality and with biased self interest as their only motivation. The people involved don’t see themselves as mentally disturbed because of the lack of a moral counterweight. This explains why we have arrived at a global situation referred to as the “Anthropocene” or “the human being as the 6th cause of destruction of life on Earth since its existence”. These indicators already allude to the collective mental disturbance that leads to self destruction. It reminds of my article “How stupid can smart be“, reflecting about the denomination of the region of Eindhoven as “the smartest of the world”. How smart is a region when it pollutes itself out of financial self interests, causing severe physical and mental disorders among its citizens? Is smartness only measured in financial terms or patents? Or in our capacity to sustain our species in a healthy, mature and progressive way? With Sustainocracy we decided for the latter.

We all have a choice. We only have to make use of it and reap the benefits. The invitation to develop it will always remain, with or without our help.

Safety is a core value for our sustainable existence

At this moment in time, safety is hard to find in the Netherlands and the world. In fact, the negative development has been going on for several decades after a short-lived reconstruction period after the Second World War. In principle, humanity has been unsafe since it started waging war out of various forms of self-interest. Political and financial interests drive people apart in competing, polarizing, negative energy fields. These extremes build up in tension until they explode. That can be done differently, but then we have to let go of that political and financial conflict of interests. A new role appears for our institutions and our democracies.

In Sustainocracy, safety is one of the five essential conditions for our existence as natural human beings and therefore a shared responsibility. That responsibility starts with respect for each other and for our natural environment. By this we mean two essential main things:

  • Acceptance of each other’s differences: appearance, clothing, faith, culture, voice, language, etc. We humans are all equal but no one is the same. By accepting each other in our diversity, we can also be curious about each other, enter into dialogue, listen to each other and develop together, without fear, judgment or prejudice. If we learn to respect each other, we can also include our natural environment in the respect.
  • Pursuing a commonly accepted higher goal: Sustainocracy is about the five essential values ​​of our existence. Self-interest is thus linked to the common interest of which nature around us is a part. Creating, caring and sharing together is the norm. This can be interwoven with rituals, celebration of coherence and loving expressions among each other.

The COS3i social inclusion approach is based on this as a priority in our human existence, in mutual coherence with each other and with our natural environment. In Sustainocracy we have created all kinds of expressions to help us with this. The concept of together for example via the English word UNITED:

  • U – Understand ….understanding the importance of cohesion and our personal commitment to it
  • N – Need ….the need to belong somewhere, to be together and function as a group
  • I – Involved ….our direct involvement in the group process from our own authenticity
  • T – Targeted …purposefulness from the common higher goal of general well-being
  • E – Entrepreneurial ….enterprising, doing from being, creating and adapting
  • D – Devoted …..with the heart, connecting with each other, with meaning and motivation.

This approach is implemented intergenerationally so that our young people see adult role models that they can mirror in their development. Role models that radiate peace and inspiration, not coercion, control or unrest. COS3i clusters of self-reliant communities can build mutual networks and relationships in the same peaceful way. In this way, cities and regions can develop without political and financial competition but on the basis of constructive, positive cooperation, exchanges and coexistence. The major challenges can also be tackled in this way by having clusters work together, whereby some clusters can develop unique institutional properties that serve as instruments for the higher purpose (knowledge, innovation, infrastructure planning). But our instruments never take over the responsibility from us as human beings.

Health leadership in the USA

A lot is being said about Donald Trump and not all of it is very supportive to say the least. Especially when it comes to his approach to deep state, kicking holy houses of the capitalist and warfare lobbies. With this tweet today he proves that actions say more than words. It is a type of health based leadership that I have not seen yet in our European cabinets.

Donald Trump on Twitter (X):

I am thrilled to announce Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as The United States Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS). For too long, Americans have been crushed by the industrial food complex and drug companies who have engaged in deception, misinformation, and disinformation when it comes to Public Health. The Safety and Health of all Americans is the most important role of any Administration, and HHS will play a big role in helping ensure that everybody will be protected from harmful chemicals, pollutants, pesticides, pharmaceutical products, and food additives that have contributed to the overwhelming Health Crisis in this Country. Mr. Kennedy will restore these Agencies to the traditions of Gold Standard Scientific Research, and beacons of Transparency, to end the Chronic Disease epidemic, and to Make America Great and Healthy Again!

He has not even been installed yet and gets out the broom to whipe the floor in a way no one else has done before. On the contrary, the world is full of pain and trash because of politicians luring with business at the expence of our health and environment. This tweet at least is a breath of fresh air.