Home » Society (Page 148)

Category Archives: Society

The end of the car

For many this may be a strange and even absurd title. The car has become a part of our life that we cannot imagine eliminated. The car has become a culture on its own, a status symbol and key user item within our daily routines. Why then such provocative title as if the car would disappear? Let us look at some signs and common sense:

Signs:

  • The European Commission issued a paper in which the car is banned from any city environment by 2050.
  • 80% of our car use is for the short distance. If we live in the city and car use is banned we serious ask ourselves why we would need to possess one if just used for family visites, recreation and travel out of town?
  • A paper was issued annoucing plans to introduce CO2 tax on usage of vehicals. For many decades governments have enriched themselves on taxes over fuel and never bothered about CO2 until the global warming started to become an issue. Using tax money to pay for a larger infrastructure now they want to use our CO2 emissions to reduce their deficits. If at the same time they open up their policies for speeded introductions of vehicals on alternative energy forms this taxing may be stimulous for people to consider such car. But what would be next? A tax on fine dust emision of the tires?
  • In many large city the space burden of cars is tremendous. Not just a car that is in use and causes pollution, traffic jams and accidents, but also a stationed car that causes spacial problems when not in use, which is most of the time. Parking in those cities has gone up as much as 7 euros per hour, growing steadily to discourage car ownership.
  • In villages the luxory of a parking space in the street in front of the house is now seen by government as a service which can be charges as one uses public space that otherwise could be used for other activities, s.a. foodproduction or recreation ground for children en elderly people or space for CO2 reducing and water managing living green. Yearly tarrifs of 3000 euros and more have been seen already in certain municipalities. This, over an average life time of 5 years of a new car in a family, dubbles the cost of ownership.
  • Petrol has grown tremendously expensive over de last few years. At the end of the month the traffic jams reduce because people cannot use the car anymore until their next pay check arrives. They stay at home,use public transportation or use alternative facilities like car sharing, the bycicle, etc.
  • Less directly visible is the annual cost of pollution and green house effect in cities on human health. It is scientifically estimated that a government can save yearly up to 700 euros per inhabitant if they pay attention to air quality alone (http://www.aireas.com ).
  • Also less visible and measurable is the lack of human productivity due to time inefficiencies in private transportation, health issues due to stress and pollution and long term consequences of reduced family quality time on children due to long parental absence during the day.
  • The entire world economy is under pressure due to the intense speculation with money of banks, governments, multinationals, etc. The crises follow each other up rapidly each with a strong national but also potentially global character. It becomes more and more difficult to have and to keep a job while social securities, pensions and insurances are also under pressure due to mismanagement of funds. While our individual financial securities show a decreasing line the cost of our traditional life style is rocketing sky high with the end not yet in sight. More and more people are seriously looking at their quality of life all together and feel forced to start considering important modifications. The untouchable luxury of the car is slowly becoming touchable.
Common sense:
All these signs together are a wake up call for us as individuals to start considering our dependence on our car and look for alternatives before the cost of ownership of a vehicle exceeds our posibilities. Common sense says:
  • that using a vehicle with a weight of more than 1000 kg to transport a human body of 80 kg is a serious waste of energy in times that this becoming very scarce and expensive.
  • that the booming growth of vehicles in use in the world, from 150 million 40 years ago to 130 billion now, is bound to reach limits in every aspect of its existence if not modified along the way. As the car today in essence is the same as a car 100 years ago we see all kinds of difficulties appearing in usage of resources, space, etc.
  • for many decades the car has been a significant part of any nation’s economy through huge taxation on ownership and usage, as well as all the labor it produced in the manufacturing processes, services and expansion of infrastructures. This has caused these same governments to push for growth in the sector and become reluctant to stimulate innovations in this field.
  • changing the entire automotive panaroma requires a lot of time and effort now and this has not very much to do just with the car itself or all surrounding factors but with our own human mentality and culture around the ownership and availability of a vehicle. People are still willing to eat less or with reduced quality to maintain their luxus of a car that is not used 80% of the time.
  • no one abandons freely the car if this is not compensated with alternative ways for getting from A to B that are at least as easy and comfortable in use as the car. The investment to make alternatives available and the effects of such alternatives on our surroundings is tremendous. Right now many governments are reluctant to take one this transformation due to their economic dependence on the old complex mobility but soon they will have no choice. When that occurs a whole new perspective opens up for business and social innovation but not without a serious dip in economic stability of the region. Organic transformation to a new system in parallel with the reduction of the old system would have been the best choice but for that it seems too late. A compulsory transformation pushed by crises will be more likely to happen now. The sooner it occurs the better it will be for the individual and sustainable potential of the entire region.
So, if you ask me again: is the end of the car in sight? I would respond YES! At least the way we know automobility as it stands today. We are facing rapid and important changes in the near future. How long will it take? I can only guess. The complexity of variables is huge but a few parameters are key: when will the expected crisis of China occur that will again bring a global crisis? When will other financial based crises around the world (Greece, Portugal, food, water, etc) cause a new global crisis? When will we run out of oil?
I expect all this to happen within the next five to eight years max. So the transformation of our automotive world will come hand in hand with these crises. Ten years from now we will not use cars anymore as we do today.

The art of letting go

In my daily activities I find my self in a happy situation of meeting many people who all wish to contribute to a better world. What strikes me is that all are very much attached to particular elements of the old world that they try to change. This is not at all strange because this old world is still very dominantly present in our daily routines. One of the toughest issues that people need to learn to cope with is the art of letting go.

The very process starts with the development of personal awareness that things need to change and that this change comes about by taking personal responsibility. This insight has an origin that nearly always has to do with some kind of personal chaos that arises after some traumatic experiences. The reason that gave rise to this situation of chaos can be very diverse. I have seen people come in chaos after a marriage break up, the loss of a job, the death of a loved one, a burn-out situation, etc. etc. The emotional or financial sense of security that may have been present before the chaos has disappeared getting people to find themselves without any stable foothold to stand on.

The pain of insecurity, lack of balance and personal chaos illuminates the mind and sole to find new opportunities, a sense of purpose and renewed drive to progress.  In this process one confronts experiences of the past with idealism how things should be. If in the past moral complexities were not taken in consideration these now come intensified into the picture.

The process of letting go is as complex as the one to restructures one’s life an commitment to fullfilment. Memories are still very vivid around those elements that provided securities in the past and which one is temped to revive when one searches new securities. The past is gone for ever and living back what once was is only creating a mental dependence that blocks the potential of the future to present itself in its widest diversity.

Another issue that requires letting go is the pain that is felt in the past when things happened that caused suffering. One is tempted to avoid or condition new actions in fear for pain to happen again. People tend to enter new relationships as if they were the cause of ancient wounds instead of giving them the change to develop. Letting go is fundamental to give the past a position were it belongs and offer the future the opportunity to start from scratch. The future cannot be blamed for the past and the past may not block personal organization after enlightenment. Letting go is a way of getting peace with whatever happened and addressing the future with strength and self confidence.

The last thing that condition people in their evolution to true wealth is the mental attachment to material possessions. When a person gets into a situation of personal chaos this often goes together with the loss of material means. Even when insight and enlightenment comes one still tends to refer to all those things that one once had. When communicating in such way it is tempting for the listener to judge the person for what he or she has lost. It is a serious issue to let go also of possessions that have been lost. They cannot be recovered by longing to them and they lack importance. The real importance resides in the process of enlightenment that one undergoes and that feeds the sole to a richer personal identity. They relativety of possessions becomes clear only when one lets go an concentrates on what one is, not on what one has or used to have.

After the complex process of letting go securities, pains and possessions of the past one feels the exiting freedom of limitless existence. This is important to grow in a new role without the limitation of mental, physical, emotional or spiritual dependence. When one has let go one does not expect anything from anyone anymore, does not wait for anyone anymore and only relies on one’s personal existence, self esteem and confidence. One encounters then true leadership over personal existence that provides the strong sense of human equality that is needed for powerful human interaction in a sustainable way.

The art of letting go is the same as giving yourself room and freedom to expand on all levels of human complexity and organize yourself without expectations, limitations or influences from outside. Letting go you get hold of …yourself.

Osama Bin Laden effect

After spending some time on developing the column of values in a series of my recent blogs now it is maybe of interest to have a look at how this may work since the death of Bin Laden.

I first came across the name Bin Laden when I got back to the Netherlands in 2001. We settled temporarily in the house of an old aunt of mine who had moved to an elderly home. Her house was for sale and we had to bridge 5 years waiting list to get into a rental house. Suddenly a morning in September I was called by my father that I had to switch on the TV as something was going on in New York. I tuned in at the exact moment the second plane was flown into the Trade Center building. Only a few years before I had stood on top of those buildings myself and the view of what was happening was not only shocking, it hit me personally for that reason. When a little later the buildings collapsed my horror was intense even more than my family who had never been there. That was the first time I heard about Bin Laden.

Aparently his name was already subject to issues in the Netherlands but in Spain where I had lived I had not come across him yet. Nor had I come across a huge moslim population s.a. in the Netherlands. Without any hessitation or difficulties I had always happily lived and worked in a multi cultural environment in a constructive and open way. I had come to the Netherlands with exactly that attitude. I did not know otherwise.

The combined effect of the attack on the buildings, a terrorist that claimed world leadership on chaos and the possible connection with moslims that live in the same street as me and my children caused a shock for me personally and the entire world. Suddenly one didn’t know who to trust anymore, not far away but extremely nearby.

Before 9/11 I walked the streets with my own identity and connected on equal and trust level with anyone, no matter what color, religion or origin, without a doubt in my mind. After 9/11 I was suddenly forced to reflect about important things like equality, safety, trust, cooperation…… The basics of the column of values.

One forces one self that 99,99% of all moslims are great people with the same worries and challenges as I have. But can I freely feel safe? Can I feel safe when this terrorist Bin Laden is out there creating an invisible virus over the back of the moslim religion throughout society? Who can I trust? No one anymore?!

When a year later the politician Pim Fortuyn was shot dead in the Netherlands everyone was relieved that the killer was not moslim. We sincerely feared a civil war if it had been.

Fear is something that one needs to deal with. You can be critical to yourself and pick up history books about the horrors committed by christians. But that was centuries ago. One can look at the nice islamic neighbors with whom you deal on a daily basis. But still this thing inside keeps asking if we reason the same about issues of life? Does our cultural herritage behave the same in a situation of fear? No it does not.

When the boms exploded in the underground of Madrid my 9 year old daughter was nearby with her mum. Again terror came too close. When you look at the video images of the youngsters with their back packs in the London subway you see boys that you see everywhere, every day. Who is the next bommer? The guy standing next to you at the bus stop?

Bin Laden was the hidden symbol of this virus, the mother of all evil that kept this fear and uncertainty alive. There are obviously people who wanted this to be kept in place. Fear is a great condition for dominance in an unsustainable and vulnerable world. It has been used to demand billions of dollars/euros for investment in fighting terrorism, attacking countries and get certain foreign policies through that would otherwise never had seen the light. Surely people ask themselves if Bin Laden ever existed or invented  for material purposes just like Santa Claus is claimed to be a Coca Cola stunt.

The Osama Bin Laden effect, whether live or invented, is real enough to make the column of values collaps and get individuals to grasp back to the only securities they have: their own cultural herritage and identity. You can feel safe in what you believe in or have been culturally educated. You can feel safe when you close yourself off emotionally and physically from interrelation with others with the personal excuse that the level of safety in the column is not secured at all. People get individualised and focus on personal greed and external securities s.a. material wealth, aggression to others and total paranoia to continu with this process. While the symbol of terror and chaos is alive there is no incentive at all to change as the personal investment and risk is too large.

Global instability and crises are caused by numerous parallel issues that do have a common ground of fear. Fear for terror, fear for poverty, fear for shortage, fear for subordination, fear for lack of control ……..

Now Bin Laden is dead. This symbol of global terror is eliminated. It does not matter whether he was real or imaginary. He is pronounced dead. Naturally there are people who want to keep him alive to maintain terror. Others want his dealth to become yet another symbol for a cause. Whatever the motivation of people the disappearance of the perceived source of this virus of chaos is an opening for all of us to breath and look around to see if we can trust people again. Our neighbors cannot be infected by this virus anymore, not this one anyway, which places them again at the same level of equality as I. So we can interact again without reservations.

The effect of Osama Bin Laden is that the layer of safety of the column of values can be restored. Why should we not worry for Al Qaida? Al Qaida was a subsymbol of the mother of all evil on global level. Of course Al Qaida can still do some important damage but it consists of fragmented groups of wrong idealism that has no source of symbolic inspiration anymore. The global leaders of Al Qaida may be powerful but have not the image of  devilish fear as Bin Laden had across the globe even before 9/11.

Bin Laden is gone and the careful process of recovery of values can start, starting with each and everyone of us, embrassing our moslim brothers and sisters as they can embrasse us again, eliminating fear while working together again on this higher purpose that unites us all: a safe, healthy and vital society.