Home » Posts tagged 'sustainocracy' (Page 3)
Tag Archives: sustainocracy
Safety is a core value for our sustainable existence
At this moment in time, safety is hard to find in the Netherlands and the world. In fact, the negative development has been going on for several decades after a short-lived reconstruction period after the Second World War. In principle, humanity has been unsafe since it started waging war out of various forms of self-interest. Political and financial interests drive people apart in competing, polarizing, negative energy fields. These extremes build up in tension until they explode. That can be done differently, but then we have to let go of that political and financial conflict of interests. A new role appears for our institutions and our democracies.

In Sustainocracy, safety is one of the five essential conditions for our existence as natural human beings and therefore a shared responsibility. That responsibility starts with respect for each other and for our natural environment. By this we mean two essential main things:
- Acceptance of each other’s differences: appearance, clothing, faith, culture, voice, language, etc. We humans are all equal but no one is the same. By accepting each other in our diversity, we can also be curious about each other, enter into dialogue, listen to each other and develop together, without fear, judgment or prejudice. If we learn to respect each other, we can also include our natural environment in the respect.
- Pursuing a commonly accepted higher goal: Sustainocracy is about the five essential values of our existence. Self-interest is thus linked to the common interest of which nature around us is a part. Creating, caring and sharing together is the norm. This can be interwoven with rituals, celebration of coherence and loving expressions among each other.
The COS3i social inclusion approach is based on this as a priority in our human existence, in mutual coherence with each other and with our natural environment. In Sustainocracy we have created all kinds of expressions to help us with this. The concept of together for example via the English word UNITED:
- U – Understand ….understanding the importance of cohesion and our personal commitment to it
- N – Need ….the need to belong somewhere, to be together and function as a group
- I – Involved ….our direct involvement in the group process from our own authenticity
- T – Targeted …purposefulness from the common higher goal of general well-being
- E – Entrepreneurial ….enterprising, doing from being, creating and adapting
- D – Devoted …..with the heart, connecting with each other, with meaning and motivation.
This approach is implemented intergenerationally so that our young people see adult role models that they can mirror in their development. Role models that radiate peace and inspiration, not coercion, control or unrest. COS3i clusters of self-reliant communities can build mutual networks and relationships in the same peaceful way. In this way, cities and regions can develop without political and financial competition but on the basis of constructive, positive cooperation, exchanges and coexistence. The major challenges can also be tackled in this way by having clusters work together, whereby some clusters can develop unique institutional properties that serve as instruments for the higher purpose (knowledge, innovation, infrastructure planning). But our instruments never take over the responsibility from us as human beings.

Impact of applying Sustainocracy
Today I received the following message from Uganda.
Nakivale Refugee Settlement, Uganda: Sustainocracy Impact
*3,000+ refugees benefited from sustainable agriculture training
*500+ children enrolled in vocational programs
*80% reduction in water-borne diseases
*90% increase in community-led initiatives
Empowered refugee leaders, improved social services, and enhanced resilience.
In a refugee camp, where financial poverty reigns, people depend on each other. But if there is no engagement leadership this hardly happens. And leadership needs to be empowered, not by hierarchical subordination but through methods of empowerment of their surroundings. With the set of core human values as a shared responsibility, the division of tasks (input) and the sharing of the output, becomes a valuable glue to form society. A society based on community spirit, leadership in terms of common wellness objectives, learning together and stimulating local solution driven creativity.
In the Western world, in which all the societal functions got strongly economized, fragmented and politized, the Sustainocratic approach can have equal benefits and many more. They however need to deal with the fragmented interests and established unsustainable public comforts that have grown over time. In the process of overcoming them we see benefits in terms of social cohesion, significant health improvement, less societal costs, improved mental health, increased creativity and innovation, elimination of poverty and individualism, etc. But these benefits are only experienced after the letting go process of the economic growth push of politics, the transformation of comforts and engagement of citizens and 4 x WIN adaptation of business entities. Not an easy task as a voluntarily driven process, avoiding the involuntary dramas of crises and recessions. Human tendency is to stick to its comforts until they break. Showing the benefits may get a percentage of society to engage and become a positive and evolutionary example for others to follow. Cudos to Nakivale in Uganda for being such an example.


Mental health empowerment
At the request of the global magazine “Mental health” I wrote a scientific article about this. This is based on another article of mine about the phenomenon of a mental “breaking point” or a change in thinking and acting that is motivated by moral meaning. This means that someone questions his or her own behavior, often pushed by the imposed norms of society or old personal ways of thinking (traditions, trauma), and decides to completely change course. A special side effect is that mental health is given a strong boost through meaning and a strong commitment to the moral values on which decision-making is based. In my case, this became the basis for the emergence of Sustainocracy as an evolutionary proposition for human societies. Over time, I came into contact with many people who walked with me on this path of Sustainocracy for some time. They often carried a mental backpack of old traumas, negative self-image, fears, insecurities, etc. that all in one way or another arose from the current money-driven and strongly hierarchical society. Due to the lack of an alternative, these people continued to have mental health problems. When they came into contact with Sustainocracy and the associated human values, a new perspective emerged, a form of meaning that contributed to a form of healing and empowerment for all kinds of people. This was often still hampered by the pressure of the system authorities and associated expectations, but the relativism had planted the seeds.

The current uni-dimensional money-driven society is structurally unhealthy and produces mental ill health as can be seen in the culture of fear that is also fueled by the polarization of political parties. The entire financial political structure is located in the unhealthy, immoral quadrant of the drawing. This is reflected in the many problems in the world that are often caused by this competitive control politics. We are all part of that, partly due to the forced dependency imposed by the system. My own personal turning point brought me to the point of commitment to human values. At that time I had no idea of the impact of this on the mental health of me and my environment in general. This is because I first had to let go of forms of unhealthy control and fears. I was able to do this with confidence because of the meaning that had invaded me. In all the activities that I subsequently developed, healthy, warm interpersonal ties were created, also with people in hierarchical positions of all kinds of companies and institutions, including governments. The shared commitment to, for example, the “healthy city” approach in Eindhoven and the surrounding area provided a healthy mental dose of meaning, creativity, mutual connections and goal-oriented motivation. These are all building blocks for mental health, in contrast to fear, uncertainty, competition, hatred, judgment, jealousy, etc. that are caused by our one-sided social management based on money, dependency, performance, political interests, competition, inequalities, control, meaningless growth (with many negative impacts), etc. We are often unaware of the mental ill-health that this form of society causes because we are completely mentally absorbed in the activities (work, consumption, entertainment) that are expected of us or have become part of our blind comforts. We often feel the symptoms of mental disturbance and unrest but do not make conscious connections because of the culture in which we live. We only notice the real difference when we let go of this, experience the turning point ourselves and let the meaning do its work. With Sustainocracy everyone has a choice. But the choice has a price. That price is not expressed in money but in letting go of control and fear, and embracing human values and cooperation. Mental health is a result.