Home » Society (Page 49)

Category Archives: Society

4 x Win Index

MDE Index or the Multidimensional Entrepreneurship Index

Modern enterprises, or institutions, no matter what their identity is (government, business or science), are becoming increasingly values driven. This means that they justify their existance by the contributions they represent in the societal ecosystem of sustainable human wellness.

This is a very different world than the one we leave behind. This was measured entirely by financial dependence and goals, referred to as 1 x Profit (1 x WIN) or the single bottom line profitability. This world would pass any human, social and ecological consequences of its functioning to society while focussing entirely on its own selfish financial excellence. This old way of working would differentiate business (1 x WIN) from governance (3 x COST) where governance would try to sustain itself through financial debts, taxes and regulations. 4 x WIN (the Pyramid Paradigm) brings the institutions together within the common purpose of values driven societal and ecological wellness for sustainable human progress.

The MDE 4 x WIN Index highlights those who produce genuine value

In the image below we see why we have such huge problems in the world and how we can solve them through the transition towards 4 x WIN (Sustainocracy).

The image also shows the mayor transition required for all involved to move from 1 x WIN/3 x LOSS to 4 x WIN. Those who do will take the benefits as the old 1 x WIN environment will gradually disappear. The transition to 4 x WIN by citizens and institutions is an awareness driven ecolution even though it is often sensed by those in the process as a revolution for themselves. They feel however reassured in the process when sensing the appreciation and engagement of the surroundings that undergoes the same evolutionary challenges.

The 4 x WIN Index is yet another stimulous to develop this environment and make it grow with more and more institutions making the move from 1 x WIN to 4 x WIN. Sustainocracy creates environments where institutions can develop themselves in this servant environment and enter a positive learning curve with many gratifying impulses. Examples of such 4 x WIN environments are:

  • AiREAS – health and environmental quality
  • FRE2SH – city farming and rural food resilience development
  • COS3i – social citizen’s inclusion in core human values driven processes
  • School of Talents & Wellness – participatory learning in 4 x WIN
  • Earthbeat – engagement of world wide youth through video sharing of 4 x WIN initiatives
  • your initiative?

Rutger Bregman on basis income

A basic income could eliminate poverty…..

We tend to agree with the arguments of Rutger Bregman. The only problem we see is twofold. We do not only have to solve poverty. We also have to break with the destructive self centeredness of the large enterprises, often in support of central governments out of tax dependencies.

Would it help to cream off the top of capitalism?

This is what Rutger Bregman said that got him a status of public hero..

The problem in his solution is “who would do the taxing”? The national governments already are hooked on the strings of these capitalist crossborder globalists. They can hardly do anything by themselves. And if they could they would have to relay the money into a public fund for the basic income. Or would they have to have to do this through the United Nations?

The global rich are reluctant to let go of their cash. It provides them with huge power and control, not just unlimited cash for investment. And if they did let go then the power would be put in the hands of the fund collector. And with all this we have not yet addressed the destructive processes on our ecosystems, our social environments, etc.

Sustainocracy goes for local for local, including a basic local income

Within the capitalist context a basic income would rapidly be sucked empty by the selfish pyramid of financial interests. It would also retain the risk of anyone deciding to cut the strings of the funding out of political or power interests. Redesigning society for local resilience through independence would also allow for the creation of a circular local basic income fund. It would probably be based on a local currency and the stimulous for local productivity of the local population. Globalization would be redefined into a network of self sufficient clusters that share their abundance to the most needed in the network.

From reacting to symptoms to applying awareness for mechanisms of integral change

One of the main challenges we face as society is to break with the treatment continuum within a structurally unhealthy and destructive financially steared and dependent paradigm. What does this mean?

Our human community presence and participation is guided by a jobs related productivity in a political and financial ecosystem created by humankind. We get rewarded through those financial means. This gives us access to the perceived abundance provided by this system in order to fullfil our daily needs. When signs or symptoms arise of system flaws, in terms of human illnesses, pollution, poverty, inequality, etc, we try to resolve them through treatments. These are focused on getting back to the optimal status quo (the neutral point) for system’s productivity.

A political financial system, such as capitalism, reacts to signs and symptoms that potentially destabelize the functioning of the system. It does not react to the disfunctional relationship it has with other overarching systems such as nature in general or the complexity of biological or spiritual human health. The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are a clear example of such a treatment paradigm that tries to fight premature (system) death by addressing issues that are caused by the system itself. It does not dispute the system itself.

We see this in the example of covid-19. The system already reacted to exponential rise of health care needs due to unemployment, poverty and an aging population. It did that through a general cost reduction program of the health care systems. They also raised health care prices, insurrances and personal financial contributions to the services. It also reacts on the impact on the IC capacity by both reducing the IC capacity and attempting to reduce the affluence of very sick people through lock down mechanisms and vaccination campaigns. It react to Covid19 as if it were the only problem at hand. Suddenly all other diseases seemed to have disappeared, just like system related health issues like diabetes, overweight, alcohol and drug abuse, negative stress, behavior disorders, etc. They don’t receive equivalent attention at all.

It does this purely from a system’s dynamics (premature system death as seen in financial crises, system collapses, etc). The measures have nothing to do with human health, a healthy society or a healthy economy. On the contrary! We even see that those reactive measures create an overload of new signs and symptoms (stress, burn outs, delayed treatments of other diseases, people aggression, suicides, increased mental problems, climate problems, etc). The treatment paradigm again reacts with more measures, more police, more vaccines, more bureaucracy, more controls of everything, more demand for power and money. Yet it does not look at itself as the prime cause of all problems. The neutral point is never reached anymore and a point of general collaps is coming closer and closer.

Awareness and learning

Awareness is a condition of our human reality. We can place ourselves above our systems and see ourselves and all issues in multidimensional contex. This brings us into a learning curve as a species. Our systems only have this learning curve when we apply ours to them. For instance we can determine that a petrol based car produces pollution. The car itself does not. We can change the technology of the car, put on a filter or eliminate its use. The car itself will not, it will always be a car. In the case of a system such as capitalism we can see its system flaws, but it remains capitalism. So people working within capitalism act the capitalistic way, just like the petrol engine does in the car. It is the context that defines the functioning.

We cannot change capitalism, we can change the context, environment and mindset in which people (including politicans, businesses, etc) excersize their functions and responsibilities. We then learn to abandon capitalism and adopt something else, such as the core natural human values and shared responsibilities defined in Sustainocracy. The little blue square in the drawing above.

We don’t look at the premature death avoidance of capitalism, we look at the premature dealth avoidance of humankind in general and our relationship with nature (instead of money). A new awareness and learning curve appears that grows and places capitalism and everything else into context. One of the symptoms then to eliminate is the capitalist working, not by sustaining it but by replacing it. By adopting the laws of nature and our core values as our points of reference we develop our long lasting wellness as a species. We apply proactive learning and constant adaptation of the human made systems we use instead of adapting people to the systems.

This represents a mayor turnaround in governance and mindset of the entire population. If we don’t do it we will face the general collapse produced by an obsolulete system’s dynamics that is forcefully being held up by those that excersize blind power through it. If we do we need to reorganize ourselves and disconnect from the old hegemony, also in our own behavior and addressing reality.

From hierarchy
to togetherness